Posted in Public Relations by StaceyV

I joined BlueSky, the new decentralized social media platform, earlier this year, but only recently became more active on it. To be clear, I didn’t join as some kind of political statement or protest—I simply wanted to explore what all the buzz was about.

That said, I haven’t yet deleted my X account. The reason? I still follow a lot of accounts on X that I enjoy, and honestly, I haven’t found the same level of engagement on BlueSky just yet. As a result, I find myself standing at yet another crossroads in the social media world, as I —like many others —consider whether BlueSky could be a true alternative to X.

BlueSky offers a fresh take on social media by focusing on privacy, giving users more control, and reducing reliance on algorithms. But it’s still in its early stages and faces the challenge of building a larger, more active user base. Many journalists, who’ve relied on X for real-time news and interaction, are hesitant to leave because BlueSky doesn’t yet have the same audience or features. Similarly, brands are hesitant to invest in a new platform without knowing if it will deliver the same level of reach and engagement they’ve found on X. I’m wondering this too, as I manage the social media for a nonprofit client.

This raises an interesting question: As we see a growing divide between platforms like BlueSky and X, do brands now have to pick a political side? It’s becoming clear that each platform is starting to appeal to different political or ideological groups. BlueSky’s decentralized structure and emphasis on privacy seem to attract a more progressive, privacy-focused crowd, while X’s evolving dynamics under new management seem to have aligned more with certain conservative voices. Should brands have to choose where to place their support—or should they focus on reaching their audiences without being pigeonholed by the politics of a platform?

That said, there’s a lot to like about BlueSky. Its decentralized structure puts users in control of their data and the content they see, making it feel more genuine and community-driven. This is a welcome shift for those frustrated with the traditional, algorithm-heavy platforms. Additionally, BlueSky’s open-source nature allows developers to actively shape its future, which could lead to exciting innovations as it grows.

For BlueSky to truly take off, it will need to build a larger, more engaged community while continuing to improve its features. Brands, too, will need to see clear benefits before making the shift. If BlueSky can achieve this, it could become a user-focused alternative to X and other major social platforms.

The future is still uncertain, but BlueSky’s decentralized approach offers a glimpse of a more open, user-friendly social media landscape. As I continue to explore the platform, I’m hopeful that it can lead the way to a new era of online communication. Time will tell if BlueSky can become a mainstream platform that encourages deeper, more meaningful engagement across the digital world.

Follow me on BlueSky at staceyv.bsky.social.

Share this: